logo image banner image
Browse all Articles
Browse by Country
Browse by University
Browse by Subject
Browse by Journal
Browse by Author
Arabic Articles

Sponsor image

Sponsor our database

Main Sponsors:

1. King Saud University

Copyright © 2009 Arab Repository
All rights reserved.

Our Address here
Tel: +44 (0) 7704335354


Home > Journals > J. King Saud Univ, Educational Sciences & Islamic Studies > Full Article:
<< Back

Title: a research brief about contestation probability evidences relating to the narrator in the viewpoint of speakers: practical study
Author(s): dekhel s. al-lhedan
Source: J. King Saud Univ, Vol.17,Ed. Sc. & Isl Stud (2) (year 2004), 1181-1238

Abstract: This research is paying attention to conjugated probable evidences with which speakers of Imams treated in identifying between contestation and praise which are in contradiction, where this is considered as one of the contestation and praise science which contains: Introduction: which contains the subject importance, why chosen, its precedence in this field and the research plan. Preamble: involves a brief description about the meaning of praise and evidences in terms of language and terminology. First theme: contestation probability evidences relating to narrator’s relation, his heresy, God-fearing and piety, such as letting the narrator’s relation, or the appearance of his heresy after his straightness, or keeping praise on the narrator’s piety and God-fearing. Second theme: contestation probability evidences relating to his students, critic narrating to him, about whom there was no person said anything as occurred with others previously, or mentioning that the narrations of the major critic are different in the term of discussion, or astonishment, or what not reached from the majors sayings, or choosing, or Al-Bukhari and Muslim less producing for the narrator and kept this in the following indications, and commentaries or narrating them for him to explain his roughness. Third theme: contestation probability evidences relating to his narrations, illusion and his individuals, such as his less narrations and roughness used, or the weakness of the person following the narrator, or his grouping to many Shieks in one context with different expressions, or may his narrations same as the narrations of another one but more famous, or it is proven that he has narrated wrong sayings; or his for many individuals and deniers. Conclusion: research main results. Contents: narrator’s table of contents, resources and references and topics..

Addresses: department of the sunnah; college of principles of religion, al-imam muhammad ibn saud islamic university, riyadh, saudi arabia..

FullText: Click Here to access the full text
Country Code: SA